The automatic liveness test
Authenticating is easy — the attacker has dictionaries and time. What it lacks is certainty about what's on the other side. The session could be a real shell, a honeypot, a server that accepts connections but blocks commands, or an environment with output disabled. The scanner resolves that uncertainty before sending its real instructions. It does so with the simplest command there is.
The third variant is the most revealing. echo -e '\x41\x42\x43' prints "ABC" — but it does so via hex sequences, not literal text. The purpose isn't to hide the content (ABC needs no hiding), but to verify that the shell correctly interprets escape sequences. That's tactical information: if the shell processes -e with escape sequences, the attacker knows exactly what environment it's working with.
The gate that filters sessions
If the echo returns the expected text, the scanner moves to the next phase — in this campaign, the GPU hunter. If there's no response or the output is unexpected, the session is discarded. This explains why a significant share of sessions end without any further command: the echo didn't respond as the script expected, and the automation moved on to the next target.
In the sessions analyzed, the echo always precedes the hardware reconnaissance block. The full sequence, in sessions that reached phase 2:
echo test → lspci | grep VGA → nvidia-smi -q → uname -s -v -n -r -m
The echo acts as a traffic light: green, carry on; no response, discard. It's the lowest possible cost to avoid wasting the rest of the script on a useless environment. The full pattern of the GPU hunter that comes next is analyzed in detail in the previous article in this series.
Why this signature matters
The echo as a liveness check isn't exclusive to this campaign — it's a universal pattern in automated SSH tooling. Any script that needs to verify it has a functional shell before continuing uses it. That makes it a more reliable behavioral signature than the source IP or the SSH client's User-Agent. A burned IP is replaceable in minutes; the script's behavioral protocol changes far more slowly.
What sets this campaign apart from a generic scanner is the subsequent sequence. The echo only has value if what comes after is deliberate — and in this case it is: a GPU hunter targeting infrastructure with graphics accelerators. The echo is the first line of the script; the rest of the script reveals the intent.
Detection — and its limits
The echo itself isn't an alarm — it's a legitimate command. The signature is the context: an echo immediately after authentication, with no legitimate prior command, is script behavior, not human.
- Alert on
echo -ewith hex sequences in SSH sessions:echo -e '\xNN\xNN'immediately after authentication has no legitimate administrative use. It's automated tooling. - Correlate echo with what comes after: an isolated echo with no later commands (a session ending in 2-3 seconds) is a scanner discarding the target. An echo followed by
lspciornvidia-smiis a GPU hunter in the reconnaissance phase. - Monitor session duration: sessions ending in under 5 seconds with only 1-2 commands are scanners, not administrators. Grouping these sessions by IP automatically reveals the attacker's infrastructure.
- Fail2ban with a low threshold for ultra-short sessions: a client that connects, runs an echo and disconnects in 3 seconds is indistinguishable from a scanner. Banning IPs with that repeated pattern cuts log noise with no impact on legitimate users.
The echo -e '\x41\x42\x43' variant is detectable because it uses hex sequences. The simple variant — echo 1 — is indistinguishable from legitimate use. No alerting rule catches it without massive false positives.
What does detect both variants: session behavior. A server that introduces artificial latency in the first 200ms, or returns output slightly different from expected, can make the scanner discard the target without knowing why. Passive defense covers where active detection fails.
The echo has no secrets. It exfiltrates no data, installs nothing, opens no ports. It's just a question: is anyone there? The answer it gets determines whether your server will receive the rest of the attack. The signal is worth its weight in gold precisely because it's so cheap to send: if the attacker bothers to ask the question, it's because what comes next matters.
Data collected for cybersecurity research purposes. All information comes from unsolicited activity recorded on our own infrastructure.
honeypot CipherSentry · 2026-06-26 a 2026-06-28